A Clarification

The post emphasizes the importance of allowing controversial ideas to be discussed in society, arguing that progress often stems from unpopular opinions. While advocating for free speech, it distinguishes between tolerating harmful behavior and fostering open dialogue. The author reflects on how societal norms evolve and warns against the dangers of suppressing discussions on offensive topics, which can hinder moral and scientific advancement.

Published 2017-12-16 3 min read 607 words 2 topics

Before you set out 3/5 Navigation SeverityCartographic IncidentThe route is real, but the signage gets weird enough to deserve a field note.

Excerpt · opening linespulled from source

I made a point in this post inelegantly in a way that was easy to misunderstand, so I’d like to clarify it. I didn’t mean that we need to tolerate brilliant homophobic jerks in the lab so that we can have scientific prog

SamNav stores no post bodies. Only enough to orient you - the rest lives at the source.

Original source

Read the full essay on Sam Altman's blog

blog.samaltman.com/a-clarification

Opens the original in a new tab · last reachable 2026-05-02

Go to source ↗

→

Nearby Entries

Within range by shared topic and coordinate - not by an algorithm.

SA-2013-06 2SeverityPoorly Marked

What happened to innovation?

The post explores the dual nature of innovation, highlighting a slowdown in physical advancements while software innovation accelerates. It argues that investment trends favor short-term, low-cost software projects over long-term, high-risk physical innovations. The author calls for a renewed focus on radical innovation and suggests changes in funding models to encourage breakthroughs in various fields beyond the digital realm.

10 MIN

↗ shares 2 topics

SA-2015-02 3SeverityCartographic Incident

The Software Revolution

The post discusses the ongoing software revolution, highlighting its potential to create wealth while simultaneously destroying jobs and exacerbating inequality. It warns of the concentration of power in small groups, particularly regarding emerging technologies like AI and synthetic biology, which pose existential threats. The author advocates for sensible legislation and proactive measures to harness technology's benefits while mitigating its risks.

5 MIN

↗ shares 2 topics

SA-2020-03 2SeverityPoorly Marked

Please Fund More Science

The post argues for increased funding for scientific research to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and future health crises. It highlights the urgent need for government support in research and development, while praising the rapid innovation and dedication of biotech companies and research labs. The author encourages investors and donors to contribute to scientific efforts, emphasizing the potential for positive impact and opportunities in this field.

2 MIN

↗ shares 2 topics