Time to Take a Stand

The post argues that tech companies must take a stand against objectionable actions by the Trump administration, particularly the executive order perceived as a Muslim ban. It emphasizes the importance of public opposition to protect rights and encourages tech leaders to unite in their response. The author calls for proactive engagement from employees and companies to resist further erosion of rights.

Published 2017-01-28 3 min read 620 words 3 topics

Before you set out 2/5 Navigation SeverityPoorly MarkedFindable with effort. The title or placement undersells what is actually inside.

Excerpt · opening linespulled from source

It is time for tech companies to start speaking up about some of the actions taken by President Trump’s administration. There are many actions from his first week that are objectionable. In repeatedly invoking unsubstant

SamNav stores no post bodies. Only enough to orient you - the rest lives at the source.

Original source

Read the full essay on Sam Altman's blog

blog.samaltman.com/time-to-take-a-stand

Opens the original in a new tab · last reachable 2026-06-05

Go to source ↗

→

Nearby Entries

Within range by shared topic and coordinate - not by an algorithm.

SA-2016-06 3SeverityCartographic Incident

Trump

The post argues that while Trump identifies significant issues affecting Americans, such as economic stagnation and political correctness, his proposed solutions are deeply flawed and dangerous. The author warns against Trump's demagoguery, casual racism, and lack of a serious economic plan, emphasizing the need for responsible discourse and action in the face of rising hate and division.

4 MIN

↗ shares 3 topics

SA-2016-10 3SeverityCartographic Incident

The 2016 Election

The post endorses Hillary Clinton for president, arguing that Donald Trump poses a significant threat to America due to his erratic behavior and harmful policies. The author emphasizes the importance of dialogue and understanding across political divides, cautioning against the dangers of polarization and advocating for inclusivity in democratic discourse.

3 MIN

↗ shares 3 topics

SA-2017-12 2SeverityPoorly Marked

E Pur Si Muove

The post argues that a culture of restricted speech in San Francisco stifles innovation and debate, contrasting it with a more open environment in China. It emphasizes that allowing controversial ideas, even those deemed heretical, is essential for fostering groundbreaking innovations. The author warns that political correctness can hinder the expression of novel concepts, ultimately impacting societal progress.

4 MIN

↗ shares 3 topics